Guide for prioritization of project management processes (PMBoK) in vertical construction projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.20.1.2024.08Keywords:
Projects, Project Management, Project building, Construction building project, Guide of priorization, PMI; Project Management Institute, PMBoKAbstract
Introduction: The use of good practices for the management of vertical construction projects constitutes an issue of vital importance in order that its planning, execution, and results are in accordance with the desired success criteria at a productive level, cost reduction, anticipation drawbacks, among others. Therefore, it is pertinent to study the way construction projects are managed, considering the implementation of methodologies or guides that favor good project management.
Objective: This article proposes a tool that extracts information from repositories hosted on GitHub. It analyzes the data using computational techniques and presents the results through visualizations that identify the field's technological evolution studied through the most used programming languages, central repositories, and organizations.
Method: A diagnosis of the current situation was made through a review of the literature and the collection of lessons learned from experts through a survey; Subsequently, the guide was formulated and structured, and finally, validated through expert judgment and analysis of text polarity.
Results: Obtaining a process to design the guide that can be extrapolated to other contexts, the proposed guide, and a detailed validation process, which allowed obtaining positive perceptions regarding its use and usefulness. Additionally, an instrument was developed to support the prioritization of project management processes which is published.
Conclusions: The proposed methodological guide allows prioritizing the management of the processes of the knowledge areas and was evaluated with good opinions. The process followed provides a guide for adapting project management processes in other contexts and application areas.
Downloads
References
K. Schwalbe, Information technology project management, 8th ed. Cengage Learning, 2016. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.amazon.com/Information-Technology-Project-Management-Schwalbe/dp/1285452348
Standish Group International, “CHAOS Report 2015,” p. 13, 2015.
Project Management Institute, “PULSE OF THE PROFESSION ® | 2018 - ‘Success in Disruptive Times | Expanding the Value Delivery Landscape to Address the High Cost of Low Performance,’” p. 35, 2018.
Project Management Institute, “Pulse of the Profession® 2023: Habilidades impulsoras, redefinición del éxito de los proyectos,” 2023. Accessed: Aug. 16, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pmi-pulse-of-the-profession-2023-report.pdf
Project Management Institute, “Pulse of the Profession 2021. Más allá de la agilidad,” 2021, Accessed: Aug. 16, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://acortar.link/82iMOx
K. Schwalbe, Information technology project management, Ninth Edit. Australia; United States: Cengage, 2019.
C. J. Prestan Serrano, “Análisis del sector de la construcción en Colombia.” Accessed: Aug. 16, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.gestiopolis.com/analisis-del-sector-la-construccion-colombia/
DANE, “Estadísticas por tema CONSTRUCCIÓN,” Sistema Estadístico Nacional. Accessed: Oct. 06, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/construccion
Camara Colombiana de Infraestructura, “Los factores que afectan el buen desarrollo de las obras en el país,” 2010.
A. Qazi, A. Shamayleh, S. El-Sayegh, and S. Formaneck, “Prioritizing risks in sustainable construction projects using a risk matrix-based Monte Carlo Simulation approach,” Sustain Cities Soc, vol. 65, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102576.
PMI, Guía de los fundamentos para la dirección de proyectos (Guía del PMBOK) / Project Management Institute, vol. 1. 2017. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.amazon.com.mx/Gu%C3%ADa-PMBOK-edici%C3%B3n-Pr%C3%A1ctica-%C3%81gil/dp/1628254033
Project Management Institute, Construction Extension to the PMBOK® Guide, Firs. Project Management Institute, Inc., 2016.
Project Management Institute, Guía de los Fundamentos para la Dirección de Proyectos. Guía del PMBoK, Séptima edición. Project Management Institute, Inc., 2021.
N. Alawi and K. Alwaly, “Factors Affecting the Application of Project Management Knowledge Guide (PMBOK ® GUIDE) in Construction Projects in Yemen,” International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 9, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.5923/j.ijcem.20200903.01.
D. J. Bryde, “Is construction different? A comparison of perceptions of project management performance and practices by business sector and project type,” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 315–327, 2008, doi: 10.1080/01446190701874413.
J. S. Chou and J. G. Yang, “Evolutionary optimization of model specification searches between project management knowledge and construction engineering performance,” Expert Syst Appl, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 4414–4426, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.049.
Y. Pacheco, “Dirección de un proyecto de construcción y mejoramiento de servicios educativos, aplicando estandares del PMI,” pp. 1–160, 2017.
L. A. Betancourt López, “Tesis maestría: Gerencia de proyectos. Aplicación del PMBoK a la construcción de un hotel,” Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/gerencia-de-proyectos-aplicacion-del-pmbok-a-la-construccion-de-un-hotel-202768?c=BZXmNe&d=false&q=*:*&i=1&v=1&t=search_0&as=0
S. Dixit, S. N. Mandal, J. V. Thanikal, and K. Saurabh, “Evolution of studies in construction productivity: A systematic literature review (2006–2017),” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 10, no. 3. Ain Shams University, pp. 555–564, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2018.10.010.
M. Pereira Pérez, “Tesis Maestría: Diseño de una Guía metodológica para la Selección y Priorización de Proyectos de la Empresa Constructora Vidalco S.A.,” Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://repositoriotec.tec.ac.cr/handle/2238/6363?locale-attribute=en
E. A. Méndez García, “Tesis Especialista: Análisis cualitativo de los riesgos técnicos en proyectos de construcción de pisos industriales bajo la metodología del pmi®,” Especialización en Gerencia de Proyectos, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Bogotá, 2015. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/handle/10654/7624
O. Zwikael, “The Relative Importance of the PMBOK ® Guide’s Nine Knowledge Areas during Project Planning,” Project Management Journal, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 94–103, 2009, doi: 10.1002/pmj.20116.
G. Mejía, O. Sánchez, K. Castañeda, and E. Pellicer, “Stakeholders’ issues as a source of project delays: a meta-analysis between building and road projects,” Revista de la Construccion, vol. 22, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.7764/RDLC.22.1.51.
S. M. E. Sepasgozar, R. Karimi, S. Shirowzhan, M. Mojtahedi, S. Ebrahimzadeh, and D. McCarthy, “Delay causes and emerging digital tools: A novel model of delay analysis, including integrated project delivery and PMBOK,” Buildings, vol. 9, no. 9. 2019. doi: 10.3390/buildings9090191.
S. Preethi and M. Manoharan, “Project Management and its Effects of Quality Control in Construction Sector,” International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 92–96, 2017, Accessed: Nov. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:212442741
E. Al Kuwaiti, M. M. Ajmal, and M. Hussain, “Determining success factors in Abu Dhabi health care construction projects: customer and contractor perspectives,” International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 430–445, 2018, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2017.1333401.
J. C. Paz, D. Rozenboim, Á. Cuadros, S. Cano, and J. W. Escobar, “A simulation-based scheduling methodology for construction projects considering the potential impacts of delay risks,” Construction Economics and Building, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 41–69, 2018, doi: 10.5130/AJCEB.v18i2.5842.
Y. Arefazar, A. Nazari, M. R. Hafezi, and S. A. H. Maghool, “Prioritizing agile project management strategies as a change management tool in construction projects,” International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–12, 2019, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1644757.
K. Petersen, S. Vakkalanka, and L. Kuzniarz, “Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update,” in Information and Software Technology, Elsevier, Aug. 2015, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007.
H. Cerdá, “Medios, Instrumentos, Técnicas y Métodos en la Recolección de Datos e Información,” in Los elementos de la investigación, Primera., Bogotá: El Buho, 1991. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://silo.tips/download/capitulo-7-medios-instrumentos-tecnicas-y-metodos-en-la-recoleccion-de-datos-e-i
J. Casanovas Sanz, “Como debe ser el análisis antes de tomar una decisión importante.” Blue Law Market., 2014.
W. Medhat, A. Hassan, and H. Korashy, “Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: A survey,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1093–1113, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2014.04.011.
V. Singh and S. K. Dubey, “Opinion mining and analysis: A literatura review,” in 2014 5th International Conference - Confluence The Next Generation Information Technology Summit (Confluence), 2014, pp. 232–239. doi: 10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2014.6949318.
G. Chanchí, W. Campo, and L. Sierra, “Estudio del atributo satisfacción en pruebas de usabilidad, mediante técnicas de análisis de sentimientos,” Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, no. E23, pp. 340–352, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 INGE CUC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Published papers are the exclusive responsibility of their authors and do not necessary reflect the opinions of the editorial committee.
INGE CUC Journal respects the moral rights of its authors, whom must cede the editorial committee the patrimonial rights of the published material. In turn, the authors inform that the current work is unpublished and has not been previously published.
All articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
English
Español (España)
