Main causes of shortages in logistics operations and their impact on delivery promise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17981/bilo.02.02.2020.04Keywords:
Return on Investment, Products Delivery, Cash CycleAbstract
The purpose of this article is focused on analyzing the impact of non-compliance with product deliveries on the return on investment for the company Avántika Colombia S.A.S, located in the city of Barranquilla, by means of the financial indicator known as the Cash Cycle; taking into account the main actors in this supply chain, such as suppliers and customers, as well as the management of the company's financial resources. An investigative structure is proposed based on the following fronts: 1. Data collection (Database of the Dinamic Modular System, company DMS); 2. Data analysis; 3. Calculation of the Cash Cycle. Through the analysis of the results, we seek to be aware of how the level of service negatively impacts the organization from a financial point of view, that is, how it impacts the fact of delivering the merchandise late, measuring the capacity it has the supply chain to turn the investment back into money. In this sense, we can say that a positive cash cycle allows the company to leverage efficiently, that it operates through its own resources and does not increase its indebtedness with third parties, which is given through the timely and correct taking of decisions, achieving higher level of stability and competitiveness compared to other companies in the same sector. This indicator provides us with a managerial vision of how the logistics process is being carried out and thus, seek improvement strategies for it.
Downloads
References
Algraiti y Marulkar. (2020). Working capital management and ratio analysis at tata steel. SCOPUS, 1.
BOADA, I. A. (2017). Ruta de soluciones para la gestión de inventarios en pymes del sector retail que comercialicen productos de alto volumen, con miras a respaldar su crecimiento en ventas. ESPACIOS, 3.
Boisjoly, C. M. (2020). Working capital management: financial and valuation impacts . Journal of business, 1,8,7.
Bubel, D. (2017). Implementation of the principles of the process orientation in the aspect of logistic management of. SCOPUS, 1.
Bui. (2020). How does coporate performance affect supplay chain finance? evdence from logistics secto. Scopus.
CANIZALES, C. R. (2018). ESTRATEGIAS APLICADAS A LA CADENA DE SUMINISTRO DE LAS EMPRESAS COLOMBIANAS, PARA SER COMPETITIVAS EN LOS MERCADOS
INTERNACIONALES. Bogotá, Colombia.
Durán, Y. (2012). Administración del inventario: elemento clave para la optimización de las utilidades en las. Visión Gerencial, 57.
Espejo, M. (2015). 15 grandes errores en la gestión de compras. Enfasis Logística, 2.
Farris II & Hutchison, c. e. (2013). Caso de estudio: Reducción del ciclo cash to cash a través de la gestión de inventarios en una empresa fabricante de velas. ”Innovation in Engineering, Technology and Education for Competitiveness and Prosperity”.
Goodarzi, M. S. (2017). What are causes of cash flow bullwhip effect in centralized and decentralized supplay chain . Applied mathemetical modelling, 44.
Hernández, C. L. (2016). DISEÑO E IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE UNA ESTRATEGIA DE APROVISIONAMIENTO POR PARTE DE UNA OPERADORA DE TELECOMUNICACIONES A NIVEL MUNDIAL .
LOGÍSTICA, I. D. (s.f.). INDICADORES DE LA GESTIÓN LOGÍSTICA.
López, E. T. (2012). Gestión del almacén y de las existencias (Proceso integral de la actividad comercial).
Nazarena Lazala, V. G. (2017). INTEGRACIÓN DE LA CADENA DE SUMINISTRO PARA EVITAR EL EFECTO LÁTIGO. 22.
Orlis et al, C. (2020). Distribution with Quality of Service Considerations: The Capacitated Routing Problem with Profits and. Scopus, 1-2.
Polanco, M. T. (2016). EL ABASTECIMIENTO ESTRATÉGICO Y SU APLICACIÓN EN LAS EMPRESAS. 138.
