Item Analysis on an English Placement Test at a Colombian university

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17981/cultedusoc.11.2.2020.11

Keywords:

Foreign languages evaluation, Testing, Placement test, Item analysis, Language testing literacy

Abstract

This article reports the results of a research project in which the difficulty index (IF) and discrimination index (ID) were measured in an English placement test designed by and for a Colombian public university. The test was made up of a grammar and vocabulary section, an oral comprehension section and a written comprehension section. The measurement of the indexes allowed categorizing excellent, acceptable and defective items for their subsequent correction or discard. The results of the study suggest that the items found to be defective correspond to question with poor distractors and with problems of ambiguity in the instruction; likewise, the study confirms the lack of language assessment literacy (LAL) among foreign language teachers and suggests the need for explicit training in item design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alexander Ramírez Espinosa, Universidad del Valle. Cali (Colombia)

Professor of English and Linguistics, Universidad del Valle (Colombia). Degree in Foreign Languages, Universidad del Valle (Colombia). Master in Linguistics, Universidad del Valle (Colombia). PhD in Education (studying). His research interests include foreign language assessment, intercultural communication, the development of learner autonomy, and Queer Linguistics. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7122-9537

References

Bachman, L. F. (2004). Statistical Analyses for language Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, J. D. (2011). Testing in Language Programs: A Comprehensive Guide to English Language Assessment New Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Brown, D. (2004). Language Assessment - Principles and Classroom Practice. White Plains: Pearson education.

Carr, N. (2011). Designing and Analyzing Tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ebel, R. L. y Frisbie, D. A. (1986). Essentials of Education Measurement. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Fernández, M. (2007). Propuesta Metodológica para la Creación de un Nuevo Examen de inglés en las Pruebas de Acceso a la Universidad. [Tesis Doctoral]. Granada: Editorial de la Universidad de Granada.

Giraldo, F. (2018a). Language assessment literacy: Implications for language teachers. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(1), 179–195. http://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n1.62089

Giraldo, F. (2018b). A Diagnostic Study on Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Foreign- Language Assessment. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 23(1), 25–44. http://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v23n01a04

Giraldo, F. (2019). Designing Language Assessments in Context: Theoretical, Technical, and Institutional Considerations. HOW Journal, 26(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.26.2.512

ILTA. (2001). Código Ético. [Online]. Disponible en https://www.isa-sociology.org/es/sobreisa/codigo-etico-440

Inbar-Lourie, O. (2013). Guest Editorial to the special issue on language assessment literacy. Language Testing, 30(3), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480126

Janssen, G. & Meier, V. (2013). Establishing placement test fit and performance: Serving local needs. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2013.1.a07

López, A. & Bernal, R. (2009). Language testing in Colombia: A call for more teachereducation and teacher training in language assessment. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 11(2), 55–70. Available from http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/16543/1/11442-28040-1-PB.pdf

Malau-Aduli, B. S. & Zimitat, C. (2012). The Analysis of Multiple-Choice Items of the Test of an Introductory Course in Chemistry in a Nigerian University. International Journal of Learning, 18(4), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v18i04/47579

Núñez, A. & Téllez, M.F. (2009). ELT Materials: The Key to Fostering Effective Teaching and Learning Settings. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 11(2), 171–186. Available from https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/profile/article/view/11449

Palés-Argullós, J. (2010). ¿Cómo elaborar correctamente preguntas de elección múltiple? Educación Médica, 13, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1575-18132010000300005

Paltridge, B. (1992). EAP placement testing: an integrated approach. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(05)80012-2

Sugianto, A. (2020). Item Analysis of English Summative Test: EFL Teacher-Made Test. Indonesian EFL Research & Practice, 1(1), 35–54. Disponible en http://journal.ahsanta.ac.id/index.php/EFL/article/view/13

Taylor, L. & Geranpayeh, A. (2011). Assessing listening for academic purposes: Defining and operationalising the test construct. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.002

Toksöz, S. & Ertunç, A. (2017). Item Analysis of a Multiple-Choice Exam. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies, 8(6), 141–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.6p.141

Tomlinson, B. (2005). Testing to learn: a personal view of language testing. ELT Journal, 59(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci005

Wall, D., Claphman, C. & Alderson, C. (1994). Evaluating a placement test. Language Testing, 11, 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229401100305

Published

2020-07-09

How to Cite

Ramírez Espinosa, A. (2020). Item Analysis on an English Placement Test at a Colombian university. CULTURA EDUCACIÓN Y SOCIEDAD, 11(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.17981/cultedusoc.11.2.2020.11