Pharmacovigilance in Neuroscience

Farmacovigilancia en neurociencia

Authors

  • María-Pilar Sánchez-de-Paz Sanatorio de la Trinidad Mitre
  • Gustavo Da-Prat-de-Magalhaes Sanatorio de la Trinidad Mitre
  • Santiago Isa Sanatorio de la Trinidad Mitre
  • Victoria Aldinio Sanatorio de la Trinidad Mitre
  • Andres Norberto-Latella Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Emilia Mabel-Gatto Sanatorio de la Trinidad Mitre
  • Galeno J. Rojas Sanatorio de la Trinidad Mitre/Universidad de Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17981/JACN.2.1.2021.04

Keywords:

Pharmacovigilance, Epidemiology, Adverse reactions, Drugs, Neurology, Pharmacology

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have a high impact on morbidity and mortality of the population, becoming a public health issue. Studying and publishing about these is referred as pharmacovigilance.
Objective: To describe and compare the adverse reactions produced by drugs of nervous system action (CNS-D) and neurological ADRs produced by drugs of systemic action (Sys-D). To further develop the need of reporting adverse reactions.
Methods: An observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study performed on a database of neurological consultations which took place at the Neurology department. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and divided into two groups: Sys-D and CNS-D. Demographic and neurological variables were analyzed. Parametric and non-parametric statistics were used according to distribution. The Naranjo Algorithm (NA) was used to define causality.
Results: 71 ADRs were described, from which 63.38% (n=45) were produced by CNS-D, especially antiepileptics by 47% (n=21) and psycholeptics by 44%. Of the total, 36.62% (n=26) were caused by Sys-D, such as antineoplastics (n=9) and antibiotics (n=9), being Cefepime the most frequent. The diagnosis of ADRs caused by a Sys-D was delayed prolonging hospitalization (p 0.05) due to a lower NA score (p 0.003) compared to the CNS-D group.
Conclusion: Multiple frequently used drugs of systemic action, such as antineoplastics and antibiotics, generate neurological adverse effects. From our analysis, it was presumed that the suspicion of a neurological ADR caused by these drugs was scarce, thus causing a higher morbidity for the patient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bignone, I. y Schiaffino, S. (2016). Manual de Buenas Prácticas de Farmacovigilancia. [1a ed.]. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Farmacológicas.

Bolaños, R. (Coord.). (2016). Psicotrópicos y estupefacientes. Buenos Aires: Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica. Buenos Aires: ANMAT. Recuperado de

http://www.anmat.gov.ar/ssce/Libro-psicotropicos-estupefacientes.pdf

Chaio, S.; Toibaro, J.; Valicenti, P. & Saidón, P. (2013). Reacciones adversas medicamentosas y errores de prescripción: Morbi-Mortalidad. Medicina, 73(2), 111–118. Recuperadode

http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/medba/v73n2/v73n2a03.pdf

Edwards, R. & Aronson, J. (2000). Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet, 356(9237), 1255–1259.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9

Grill, M. F. & Maganti, R. K. (2011). Neurotoxic effects associated with antibiotic use: management considerations. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 72(3), 381–393.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03991.x

Lazarou, J.; Pomeranz, B. & Corey P. (1998). Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients. A meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA, 279(15), 1200–1205.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.15.1200

Martino, G.; Rojas, G.; Sánchez, M. P.; Isaa, S.; Bres, M.; Camino, M. V..; Merchán, X.; Aldinio, V.; Parisi, V.; Persi, G.; Pereira, N. & Gatto, E. (2019). Seguridad de fármacos antineoplásicos e inmunomoduladores aplicados a la neurología. Neurolargía Argentina, 11(3), 136–144.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuarg.2019.03.001

Naranjo, C. A.; Busto, U.; Sellers, E. M.; Sandor, P.; Ruiz, I.; Roberts E.A.; Janecek, E.; Domecq C. & Greenblatt, D. J. (1981). A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 30(2), 239–245.

https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1981.154

Orta, I. A.; Garcia, O.; Triolet, A. T.; Gómez, C. & Ruiz, K. (2008). Reacciones adversas a medicamentos en una unidad de terapia intensiva. Revista Electrónica de Biomedicina, 2, 10–18. Disponible en

http://biomed.uninet.edu/2008/n2/alfonso.html

Ponte, M. L.; Ragusa, M.; Armenteros, C. & Wachs, A. (2013). Relevancia de la farmacovigilancia hospitalaria en la práctica médica actual. Medicina (Buenos Aires), 73(1), 35–38. Recuperado de

http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/medba/v73n1/v73n1a07.pdf

Rattagan, M. L.; Lisei, D.; Rojas, J. G.; Persi, G.; Parisi, V.; López , M.; Da Prat, G.; Bres M. & Gatto, E. (2016). Uso de psicotrópicos y carga sedativa en pacientes adultos con y sin demencia. Vertex, XXVII(129), 332–338. Disponible en

http://www.editorialpolemos.com.ar/vertex129.php

República de Argentina. Ministerio de Salud. (10 de septiembre de 2012). Buenas practicas de farmacovigilancia. [Disposición n° 5358]. Boletín Nacional: 23-Ene-2013. Disponible en

https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/nacional/disposici%C3%B3n-5358-2012-207727

Rojas, G.; Demey, I. & Arizaga, R. L. (2013). Medicamentos utilizados para trastornos cognitivos. Análisis de un millón y medio de prescripciones en la Argentina. Medicina (Buenos Aires), 73(3), 213–223. Recuperado de

http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/medba/v73n3/v73n3a03.pdf

Sauro, K. M.; Quan, H.; Sikdar, K.; Faris, P. & Jette, N. (2017). Hospital safety among neurologic patients: A population-based cohort study of adverse events. Neurology, 89(3), 284–290.

https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000004111

VNM. (s.f.). Vademecum Nacional de Medicamentos. Buenos Aires: ANMAT. Disponible en

http://anmatvademecum.servicios.pami.org.ar/index.html

WHO. (2010). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision. Sweden: CDC. Available:

http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010/en

WHO. (1999). Perspectivas políticas de la OMS sobre medicamentos: La farmacovigilancia: garantía de seguridad en el uso de los medicamentos. [WHO/EDM/QSM/99.1]. Ginebra: OMS. Disponible en

https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/65892

WHO/Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. (2021). The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. [Online]. Available:

https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/

WHO. The Uppsala Monitoring Centre. (2001). Vigilancia de la seguridad de los medicamentos. Guía para la instalación y puesta en funcionamiento de un Centro de Farmacovigilancia. Sweden: UMC. Available:

http://www.essalud.gob.pe/ietsi/pdfs/informacion_tecnica/OMS_guia_farmacovigilancia.pdf

Published

2021-08-27

How to Cite

Sánchez-de-Paz, M.-P., Da-Prat-de-Magalhaes, G., Isa, S., Aldinio, V., Norberto-Latella, A., Mabel-Gatto, E., & Rojas, G. J. (2021). Pharmacovigilance in Neuroscience: Farmacovigilancia en neurociencia. Journal of Applied Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), e00163800. https://doi.org/10.17981/JACN.2.1.2021.04

Most read articles by the same author(s)