Nature in the Urban Context: Renaturalisation as an Important Dimension of Urban Resilience and Planning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17981/mod.arq.cuc.26.1.2021.07Keywords:
renaturalisation, nature-based solutions, strategic planning, urban resilience, re-greening design framework, biophilic urbanism, integration of NBS, urban planningAbstract
How are our cities confronting the challenges posed by a warming climate, the loss of biodiversity and major resource depletion? ―This article discusses the opportunities and benefits of applying the concepts of renaturalisiation and rewilding of cities. It introduces Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) in urban planning that are integrated with the aim to enhance urban resilience and to slow down the biodiversity decline, which can be applied in two areas: through the conception of new green neighbourhoods; and through the regeneration and re-greening of existing but neglected parts of the city, such as postindustrial brownfields or economically weak districts. Contact to nature is essential for human existence, urban wellbeing and a good quality of life. Green spaces in cities –big or small– all contribute to health and wellbeing. However, many cities, including in the U.S. and in Europe, do not offer residents easy access to green space within the city. Improving better access to green spaces and extending gardens and parks will deliver a large number of benefits, such as ecosystem services, better water management for enhanced urban flood control, slowing down the biodiversity loss, contributing to food security, with the potential to restore damaged ecosystems. Furthermore, additional green space and NBS help to keep cities cool during heatwaves and improve the urban microclimate. As most of our cities keep growing and warming, the scale of the issue is significant. For example, in 2020, cities in the European Union were home to over 70 percent of Europe’s population, and this figure is expected to increase to over 80 percent by the middle of the century. This translates to 36 million new urban citizens in Europe by 2050 alone, who will need housing, employment, health care and access to green spaces (EU-Commission, 2018). In this context, nature-based solutions and re-greening can generate significant benefits for citizens, improve urban health and well-being, and offer an opportunity to effectively deploy nature in helping to resolve major societal challenges ―such as social inclusion, food security and disaster risk reduction. However, as the discussion of this article shows, it is essential that the design of NBS is fully integrated with other complementary planning interventions and seeks synergies across all sectors.
Downloads
References
Alberti, M. & Marzluff, J. (2004). Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosystems, 7(3), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
ASHRAE. (2010). Interactions Affecting the Achievement of Acceptable Indoor Environments. [Guideline 10]. Atlanta: ASHRAE. Available: https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/standards-and-guidelines/standards-addenda
Benyus, J. (2002). Biomimicry-Innovation inspired by Nature. New York: Harper Perennial.
Bowler, D., Buyung-Ali, L., Knight, T., Knight, T. & Pullin, A. (2010). Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape Urban Plan, 97(3), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. London/New York: Penguin Modern Classic.
City Melbourne. (2011). Urban Forest Strategy: Making a Great City Greener : 2012-2032. Melbourne: City of Melbourne.
CPRE. (2018). State of Brownfield: An analysis demonstrating the potential of brownfield land for housing. [Report 2018]. London: CPRE. Avaiable: https://www.cpre.org.uk/resources/state-of-brownfield-2018/
Cronon, W. (1995). The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature. In: W. Cronon (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature (pp. 69–90) New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Descartes, R. (1637). Discours de la méthode. Pour bien conduire sa raison et chercher la verité dans les sciences. Paris: A Leyde de l'imprimerie de Jan Maire. MDCXXXVII.
Doick, K., Peace, A. & Hutchings, T. (2014). The role of one large greenspace in mitigating London’s nocturnal urban heat island. Sci Total Environ, 493(0), 662–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.048
EU. Connecting Nature. (2019). Connecting Nature. [Online]. Available: www.connectingnature.eu
EU-Commission. (2020). Nature-based solutions. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/research-area/environment/nature-based-solutions_en
EU-Commission. (2019). EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing back Nature into our Lives. Brussels: EU-Commission.
EU-Commission. (2017). Nature-based Solutions: Innovating with Nature. Brussels: EU-Commission.
EU-Commission. (2015). Towards an EU research and innovate policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities. [Final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on ‘Nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities’]. Brussels: EU-Commission.
Fairchild, T. (1722). The City Gardener. London: T. Woodward.
Fields in Trust. (2018). Revaluing Parks and Green Spaces. [Online]. Available: http://www.fieldsintrust.org/revaluing
Girardet, H. (2008). Cities, People, Planet: Urban Development and Climate Change. (2 ed.). London: John Wiley & Sons.
Grinde, B. & Patil, G. G. (2009). Biophilia: does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(9), 2332–2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6092332
Hand, K. L., Freeman, C., Seddon, P. J., Recio, M. R., Stein, A. & Van Heezik, Y. (2017). The importance of urban gardens in supporting children’s biophilia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(2), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609588114
Hawken, P., Lovins, A. & Lovins, H. (1999). Natural Capitalism. Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. New York: Little Brown and Company.
Howard, E. (1902). Garden Cities of To-morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform. London: Osborn.
IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. [IPCC Special Report]. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
IUCN. (2020). International Union for Conservation of Nature. [Online]. Available: https://www.iucn.org/
IUCN. (2019). Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions: a User-friendly Framework (first edition). [Online]. Gland: IUCN. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.08.en
Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., Pauleit, S., Naumann, S., Davis, M., Artmann, M., Haase, D., Knapp, S., Korn, H., Stadler, J., Zaunberger, K. & Bonn, A. (2016). Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239
Kellert, S. R. (2011). Biophilic Design. The Architecture of Life. [Online]. Burlington: Tamarack Media. Available: http://www.biophilicdesign.net/
Kellert, E. & Wilson, E. O. (eds.) (1984). The Biophilia Hypothesis. New York: Island Press.
Lehmann, S. (Nov, 2020). Reconnecting with Nature: Identifying new Models of Urbanisation. In Proceedings for EAAE-ARCC International Conference and 2nd VIBRArch, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain. Available: https://www.eaae-arcc-ic.upv.es/
Lehmann, S. (2019a). Reconnecting with nature: Developing urban spaces in the age of climate change. Emerald Open Research, 1(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.12688/emeraldopenres.12960.1
Lehmann, S. (2019b). Urban Regeneration: A manifesto for transforming UK cities in the age of climate change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lehmann, S. (2018). Implementing the Urban Nexus approach for improved resource-efficiency of developing cities in Southeast-Asia. Journal of City, Culture and Society, 13(6), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.10.003
Lehmann, S. (2017). The challenge of transforming a low-density city into a compact city. J. H. P. Bay & S. Lehmann (eds.), Growing Compact. Urban Form, Density and Sustainability (pp. 69–93). London: Routledge.
Lehmann, S. (2015). Urban microclimates: mitigating urban heat stress. In: S. Lehmann (ed.) Low Carbon Cities: Transforming Urban Systems (pp. 251–262). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315766003
Lehmann, S. (2010). The Principles of Green Urbanism. Transforming the City for Sustainability. London: Earthscan.
Lennon, M. & Scott, M. (2014). Delivering ecosystems services via spatial planning: reviewing the possibilities and implications of a green infrastructure approach. Town Planning Review, 85(5), 563–587. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2014.35
Lovelock, J. E. (1979). Gaia, a new look at life on Earth. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Maes, J. & Jacobs, S. (2017). Nature-Based Solutions for Europe’s Sustainable Development. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12216
McDonough, W. & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press.
McHarg, I. (1969). Design with Nature. New York: American Museum of Natural History.
Meadows, D., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. & Behrens III, W. (1972). The Limits to Growth: a report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
Meerow, S., Newell, J. P. & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience. A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
Mitchell, T. & Harris, K. (2012). Resilience: a risk management approach. [Background Note ODI]. United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute. Available: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/7552.pdf
Neves, J. & Francke, I. (2012). Creative product design using biomimetics. Design and Nature, 160(VI), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.2495/DN120141
ONS. (2016). Small Area Population Estimates 2013. London: Office for National Statistics. Available: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/sape/small-area-population-estimates/index.html
Pauleit, S., Jones, N., Nyhuus, S., Pirnat, J. & Salbitano, F. (2005). Urban Forest Resources in European Cities. In: C. Konijnendijk, K. Nilsson, T. Randrup & J. Schipperijn (eds.), Urban Forests and Trees (pp. 49–80). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Register, R. (1987). Eco-City Berkeley: Building Cities for a Healthy Future. Boston: North Atlantic Books.
Rich, N. (aug. 1, 2018). Losing Earth: The Decade we almost stopped Climate Change. New York Times. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/01/magazine/climate-change-losing-earth.html
Rizvi, A. R., Baig, S., Verdone, M. (2015). Ecosystems Based Adaptation: Knowledge Gaps in Making an Economic Case for Investing in Nature Based Solutions for Climate Change. Gland: IUCN 48. Available: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2015-008.pdf
Sailor, D. J. (2014). A Holistic View of the Effects of Urban Heat Island Mitigation. In: S. Lehmann (ed.), Low Carbon Cities: Transforming Urban Systems (pp. 270–281). London: Routledge.
Schwarz, K., Fragkias, M., Boone, C., Zhou, W., McHale, M., Grove, J. M., O’Neil-Dunne, J., McFadden, J., Buckley, G., Childers, D., Ogden, L., Pincetl, S., Pataki, D., Whitmer, A. & Cadenasso, M. (2015). Trees grow on money: urban tree canopy cover and environmental justice. PLoS Onem, 10(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122051
Shanahan, D., Lin, B., Bush, R., Gaston, K., Dean, J., Barber, E. & Fuller, R. (2015). Toward improved public health outcomes from urban nature. American Jorunal Public Health Association, 105(3), 470–477. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302324
Sharifi, E., Lehmann, S. & Zawarus, P. (2021). Optimisation of urban cooling strategies for parking lots in hot and dry climates: case study of Las Vegas and Adelaide. In: M. Santamouris, U. Eicker & N. Enteria (eds), Urban Heat Island Mitigation. Hot and Humid Regions. Amsterdam: Springer.
Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C., Barnosky, A., Cornell, S., Crucifix, M., Donges, J., Fetzer, I., Lade, S., Scheffer, M., Winkelmann, R. & Schellnhuber, H. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(33), 8252–8259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115
Steiner, F., Weller, R., McCloskey, K. & Fleming, B. (eds). (2019). Design with Nature Now. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Tansley, A. G. (1935). The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930070
UN-Habitat. (2020). World Cities Report: The Value of Sustainable Urbanisation. [Report]. Nairobi: UN-Habitat. Available: https://unhabitat.org/World%20Cities%20Report%202020
Watts, J. (Aug 7, 2018). Domino-effect of climate events could move Earth into a ‘hothouse’ state. The Guardian. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/aug/06/domino-effect-of-climate-events-could-push-earth-into-a-hothouse-state
Woo, F., Wortmann, J., Schurig, S. & Leidreiter, A. (2014). Regenerative Urban Development: A Roadmap to the City We Need. Hamburg: World Future Council. Available: https://www.worldfuturecouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/WFC_2014_Regenerative_Urban_Development_A_Roadmap_to_the_City_We_Need.pdf
World Forum on Natural Capital. (2018). What is Natural Capital? [Online]. Available: https://naturalcapitalforum.com/about/
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 MÓDULO ARQUITECTURA CUC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0
English
Español (España)
