Prospects for developing the legal regulation of digital platforms

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.02

Keywords:

classification of digital platforms, state digital platforms, private digital platforms, platform-based approach to public administration, legal regulation

Abstract

The study considers the prospects for the legal regulation of public and private digital platforms. Digital platforms have replaced linear businesses and changed economic principles. The transition to digital technologies in the economy, business, and society substantiates the need for their legal regulation. The study aims at considering the legal status of public and private digital platforms, developing a new conceptual framework, determining the key features of digital platforms, and analyzing the prospects for developing legal regulation in this area. The paper compared management contexts in the public and commercial sectors. With the help of the generalization method, criteria for a new classification of digital platforms were proposed. The article used such methods as analysis, synthesis, deduction, and induction. The study represents a new definition of digital platforms, classifies them, and concludes that the introduction of special regulation of public and private digital platforms might require preliminary approbation, for example, in the form of an experimental legal regime. To ensure the comprehensive regulation of the activities of digital platforms, it is necessary to adopt international concepts that would allow creating uniform terms and principles. At the same time, regulation should consider the specifics of the existing regulation. On the one hand, it will be based on the dispositive method; on the other hand, it will be built over the imperative method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elena Anatolyevna Kirillova, Southwest State University. Kursk (Russian Federation) and South-Ural State University. Chelyabinsk (Russian Federation)

Ph.D. in Law, Russian Federation Southwest State University, Kursk, Russian Federation, South-Ural State University (National Research University) (Chelyabinsk, Rus- sian Federation). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7137-901X

Teymur El'darovich Zulfugarzade, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. Moscow (Russian Federation)

Ph.D. in Law, Department of Civil Legal Disciplines, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (Moscow, Russian Federation). https://orcid.org/0000-0002- 0778-1511

Oleg Evgenyevich Blinkov, Academy of the FPS of Russia. Ryazan (Russian Federation) and State University of Humanities and Social Studies. Kolomna (Russian Federation)

Doctor of Law, Academy of the FPS of Russia, Ryazan, Russian Federation, State University of Humanities and Social Studies (Kolomna, Moscow region, Russian Federation). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3506-2194

Olga Aleksandrovna Serova, Pskov State University. Pskov (Russian Federation)

Doctor of Law, Pskov State University (Pskov, Russian Federation). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4113-7399

Irina Aleksandrovna Mikhaylova, Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property. Moscow (Russian Federation)

Doctor of Law, Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property (Moscow, Russian Federation). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7305-5668

References

Andersson, J. (2017). Platform logic: an interdisciplinary approach to the platform-based economy. Policy & Internet, 9(4), 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.159

Bozeman, B. (2002). Public-value failure: when efficient markets may not do. Public Adminis-tration Review, 62(2), 145–161. Dsiponible en https://www.jstor.org/stable/3109898

Brown, A., Fishenden, J., Thompson, M. & Venters, W. (2017). Appraising the impact and role of plat-form models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service re-form: towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.003

da Silva, V. J. & Chiarini, T. (2021). Technological progress and political systems: non-institutional digital platforms and political transformation. Technology in Society, 64(C), 101460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101460

Delgosha, M. S. & Hajiheydari, N. (2020). On-demand service platforms pro/anti adoption cognition: Examining the context-specific reasons. Journal of Business Research, 121, 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.031

Dijck, J. (2019). Governing digital societies: private platforms, public values. Computer Law & Security Review, 36, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105377

Evans, D. S. & Schmalensee, R. (2017). Multi-sided Platforms. In: M. Vernengo, E. Pérez & B. Rosser (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_3069-1

Gawer, A. (2020). Digital platforms’ boundaries: the interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning, [In Press], 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102045

Gil-Garcia, R. (2012). Towards a smart state? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration and beyond. Information Polity, 17(3-4), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-000287

Haberly, D., MacDonald-Korth, D., Urban, M. & Wójcik, D. (2019). Asset management as a digital platform industry: a global financial network perspective. Geoforum, 106, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.08.009

Habrat, D. (2020). Legal challenges of digitalization and automation in the context of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 938–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.132

Haenschen, K. & Wolf, J. (2019). Disclaiming responsibility: how platforms deadlocked the Federal Election Commission's efforts to regulate digital political advertising. Telecommunications Policy, 43(8), 101824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.04.008

Hasan, M. & Starly, B. (2020). Decentralized cloud manufacturing-as-a-service (CMaaS) platform architecture with configurable digital assets. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 56(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.05.017

Ivanov, A. A. (2017). Aggregation business and law. Law, 5, 145–156.

Janssen, M. & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance – doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003

Jovanovic, M., Sjödin, D. & Parida, V. (2021). Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms. Technovation, [In Press]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218

Kirillova, E. A., Okriashvili, T. G., Yakupuv, A. G. & Pavlyuk, A. V. (2020). Legal status, role and features of electronic document management. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(Extra12), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4280116

Klievink, B., Bharosa, N. & Tan, Y.-H.. (2016). The collaborative realization of public values and business goals: Governance and infrastructure of public-private information platforms. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.12.002

Lanamäki, A. & Tuvikene, T. (2021). Framing digital future: selective formalization and legitimation of ridehailing platforms in Estonia. Geoforum, [In Press]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.016

Lathrop, D. & Ruma, L. (2010). Government as a platform. In: D. Lapthrop & L. Ruma, Open Government, (pp. 13–40). Sebastopol: O'Reilly.

Marsden, C., Meyer, T. & Brown, I. (2020). Platform values and democratic elections: how can the law regulate digital disinformation? Computer Law & Security Review, 36(1), 105373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105373

Mäntymäki, M., Baiyere, A. & Islam, A. (2019). Digital platforms and the changing nature of physical work: Insights from ride-hailing. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.007

Moazed, A. & Johnson, N. L. (2016). Modern monopolies: what it takes to dominate the 21st century economy. New York: Saint Martins' Press.

Perry, M. J. (2016). The platform transformation: how IoT will change IT, and when. Sebastopol: O'Reily Media.

Stecken, J., Ebel, M., Bartelt, M., Poeppelbuss, J. & Kuhlenkötter, B. (2019). Digital shadow platform as an innovative business model. Procedia CIRP, 83, 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.130

Sullivan, C. (2018). Digital identity – from emergent legal concept to new reality. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(4), 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.05.015

Zutshi, A. & Grilo, A. (2019). The Emergence of digital platforms: a conceptual platform architecture and impact on industrial engineering. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 546–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.027

Published

2021-08-24

How to Cite

Kirillova, E. A., Zulfugarzade, T. E., Blinkov, O. E., Serova, O. A., & Mikhaylova, I. A. (2021). Prospects for developing the legal regulation of digital platforms. JURIDICAS CUC, 18(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.02

Most read articles by the same author(s)