Communities of practice and their lifecycle strategy: systematic review from PRISMA guidelines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.44.1.2023.Org.5%20Keywords:
Situated learning, organizational learning;, communities of practice, knowledge management.Abstract
Communities of practice (CoPs) are a mechanism for knowledge management that requires the development of a strategy, to meet its objectives. The objective of this study was to verify the characteristics of the CoPs and their strategies of dynamization in their different stages of the life cycle: creation, cohesion, maturity and stability, through an analysis of the evidence reported in the academic literature. The methodology was a systematic literature review under the PRISMA methodology, the databases consulted were: EBSCO (Academic Source, Business, Education), Scielo, Dialnet and Proquest. As a result, 23 cases were selected to demonstrate that the design should be incremental, supported by the knowledge of the members, from processes of located and experimental learning, starting from the individual goals of its membersto reach a consensus negotiation that benefits the organizations and communities that contain them. The strategy of a CoP should have as its reference the life cycle, which guides the diagnosis, the design of action plans and the evaluation to achieve the stabilization of the CoP for the advancement and competitive advantage from a practice
Downloads
References
Adelle, C. (2019). Creating knowledge democracy in South Africa: The role of communities of practice. South African Journal of Science, 115(7–8), 1–3. Available: https://sajs.co.za/article/view/5888
Akinyemi, A., Rembe, S., Shumba, J. & Adewumi, T. (2019). Collaboration and mutual support as processes established by communities of practice to improve continuing professional teachers’ development in high schools. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1685446
Aljuwaiber, A. (2016). Communities of practice as an initiative for knowledge sharing in business organisations: a literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(4), 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2015-0494
Al-Shahrani, F. & Mohammad, H. (2014). Conceptual model of successful educational online community of practice for Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(9), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i9.3864
Atlas TI (versión 22) [Software de Análisis de datos cualitativos]. Berlín: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. Disponible en https://atlasti.com/es
Auer, A., Hanson, P., Brady-Fryer, B., Alati-It, J. & Johnson, A. (2020). Communities of practice in Alberta Health Services: Advancing a learning organisation. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(86), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00603-y
Austin, E., LeRouge, C., Lee, J., Segal, C., Sangameswaran, S., Heim, J., Lober, W., Hartzler, A. & Lavallee, D. (2021). A learning health systems approach to integrating electronic patient-reported outcomes across the health care organization. Learning Health Systems, 5(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10263
Awah, P., Boock, A., Mou, F., Koin, J., Anye, E., Noumen, D. & Nichter, M. (2018). Developing a Buruli ulcer community of practice in Bankim, Cameroon: A model for Buruli ulcer outreach in Africa. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 12(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006238
Barrero, B., Segovia, J. y Fernández , J. (2020). Liderazgo intermedio y desarrollo de comunidades de práctica profesional: Lecciones emergentes de un estudio de caso. Psicoperspectivas Individo y Sociedad, 19(1), 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol19-issue1-fulltext-1751
Bedoya, J., Betancourt, M. y Villa, F. (2017). Creación de una comunidad de práctica para la formación de docentes en la integración de las TIC a los procesos de aprendizaje y enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras. Ikala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 23(1), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v23n01a09
Bertolazo, T., Rejane, S. & Tenoría, N. (2020). Knowledge management: an exploratory study for knowledge transfer in a university. Conhecimento& Diversidade, 12(28), 70–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v12i28.7691
Bueno, E., Salmador, P. y Merino, C. (2008). Génesis, concepto y desarrollo del capital intelectual en la economía del conocimiento: Una reflexión sobre el Modelo Intellectus y sus aplicaciones. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 26(2), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v26i2.5424
Cantero, N. y Pantoja, A. (2018). Los retos de la dirección escolar en los centros comunidades de aprendizaje de andalucía. Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía, 29(3), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.5944/reop.vol.29.num.3.2018.23321
Chu, K.-W. (2016). Beginning a journey of knowledge management in a secondary school. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(2), 364–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2015-0155
Coombs, J., Thomas, M., Rush, N. & Martin, E. (2017). A Community of Practice Approach to Delivering Research Support Services in a Post-92 Higher Education Institution: A Reflective Case Study. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23(2–3), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2017.1329750
Coughlan, P., Hargaden, V., Coghlan, D., Idris, A. & Åhlström, P. (2018). The role of OM EDEN in building the EurOMA community. IJOPM, 38(8), 1664–1682. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2017-0353
Cristol, D. (2017). Les communautés d’apprentissage: apprendre ensemble. L’Harmattan «Savoirs», 1(43), 10–55. https://doi.org/10.3917/savo.043.0009
De Carvalho-Filho, M., Tio, R. & Steinert, Y. (2020). Twelve tips for implementing a community of practice for faculty development. Medical Teacher, 42(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1552782
De Oliveira, P., Lopes, M., Da Silva, L. e Da silva, D. (2015). Proposição do modelo DTC para gestão do conhecimento em empresas de consultoria em tecnologia de informação. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 8(4), 650–665. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465910754
Dee, J. R. & Leišytė, L. (2016). Organizational Learning in Higher Education Institutions: Theories, Frameworks, and a Potential Research Agenda. In L. Pernia (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (vol. 31, pp. 275–348). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26829-3₆
Duarte, V., Gazquez, A., Massuda, E. & Macuch, R. (2020). Comunidades de pratica em saúde - análise da plataforma online do Ministério da Saúde Brasileiro. Revista de Gestão Em Sistemas de Saúde, 9(2), 303–318. Disponível em https://periodicos.uninove.br/revistargss/article/view/16390
Duffield, S. M. (2016). Application of the Syllk model wiring an organisation for the capability of an online community of practice. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46(2), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2015-0052
Feagan, M. (2018). Fostering the next generation of sustainability leadership: Graduate student experiences with ecohealth communities of practice. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(4), 681–698. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2016-0202
Fingrut, W., Beck, L. & Lo, D. (2018). Building an oncology community of practice to improve cancer care. Current Oncology, 25(6), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.4087
Freeburg, D. (2018). Going beyond the text: Turning classrooms into communities of practice to uncover and create noncanonical knowledge. Education for Information, 34(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-189007
García-Valcárcel, A., González, L., Basilotta, V. y Martín, M. (2018). REUNI+D: una red universitaria para la construcción colaborativa de conocimiento. RIED, 21(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.2.20605
Handzic, M., Bratianu, C. & Bolisani, E. (2021). Scientific Associations as Communities of Practice for Fostering Collaborative Knowledge Building: Case Study of IAKM. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejkm.19.2.2369
Hermanrud, I. (2017). Best Fit KM: Linking Communities of Practice to an Innovation Strategy. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(1), 28–36. Available: https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejkm/article/view/1094
Hernández-Soto, R., Gutiérrez-Ortega, M. & Rubia-Avi, B. (2021). Key factors in knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities of practice: A systematic review. Education in the Knowledge Society, 22, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.22715
Jagasia, J., Baul, U. & Mallik, D. (2015). A Framework for Communities of Practice in Learning Organizations. Business Perspectives and Research, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533714551861
Jeffs, L., McShane, J., Flintoft, V., White, P., Indar, A., Maione, M., Lopez, A. , Bookey- Bassett, S. & Scavuzzo, L. (2016). Contextualizing learning to improve care using collaborative communities of practices. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1566-4
Katernyak, I., Loboda, V. & Kulya, M. (2018). eLearning within the Community of Practice for sustainable development. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 8(3), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-03-2018-0030
Kimble, C. (2020). Successful knowledge management in high-sociability organizations. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 39(3), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21993
Lacasta, D., Flayeh Beneyto, S., Manresa, J., Torán-Monserrat, P., Jiménez-Zarco, A., Torrent-Sellens, J. & Saigí-Rubió, F. (2015). Understanding the discriminant factors that influence the adoption and use of clinical communities of practice: The ECOPIH case. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1036-4
Lache, L., León, A., Bravo, E., Becerra, L. y Forero, D. (2016). Las tecnologías de información y comunicación como prácticas de referencia en la gestión de conocimiento: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Revista UIS Ingenierías, 15(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v15n1-2016003
Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In: L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 63–82). Washington: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-003
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lehtovaara, J., Seppänen, O. & Peltokorpi, A. (2019). Improving the learning of Design Management Operations by Exploiting Production’s Feedback: Design Science Approach. Design Science Approach Lean Construction Journal, 64–75. Available: https://leanconstruction.org/resources/lean-construction-journal/lcjback-issues/2019-issue/
Machado, R., Dal Forno, L. e Almeida, I. (2020). O uso de ferramentas tecnológicas como comunidades de práticas por docentes de uma rede particular de ensino. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología en Educación y Educación en Tecnología, 25, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959.25.e2
Macpherson, A., Kiersch, C. & Antonacopoulou, E. (2019). Can senior management sustain engagement and identification to support learning? Designing communities and defining goals. Journal of Strategy and Management, 13(1), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2019-0136
Mailloux, D. & Lacharité, C. (2020). Beyond new public management: Empowering community-based organisations. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(8), 2571– 2588. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22435
Martínez-Bravo, M., Sádaba, C. y Serrano-Puche, J. (2018). Desarrollo de competencias digitales en comunidades virtuales: un análisis de ScolarTIC. Prisma Social, (20), 129–159. Disponible en https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/2318
Mosala-Bryant, N. & Hoskins, R. (2017). Motivational theory and knowledge sharing in the public service. South African Journal of Information Management, 19(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v19i1.772
Murnane, S. & Browne, A. (2016). From experience to knowledge in professional IT management education: exploring the applicability of classroom learning to real-life contexts. Irish Journal of Management, 35(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijm-2016-0012
Musteen, M., Curran, R., Arroteia, N., Ripollés, M. & Blesa, A. (2018). A Community of Practice Approach to Teaching International Entrepreneurship. Administrative Sciences, 8(56), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8040056
Nicolae, M. & Nicolae, E. (2015). The quality of the educational process at university department level-A community of practice view. Amfiteatru Economic Recommends AE, 17(39), 815–822. Available: https://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/RevistaDetalii_EN.aspx?Cod=57
Ogbamichael, H. & Warden, S. (2018). Information and knowledge sharing within virtual communities of practice. SA Journal of Information Management, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v20i1.956
Page, M., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., Mulrow, C., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E., Brennan, S., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M., Li, T., Loder, E., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuiness, L., Stewart, L., Thomas, J., Tricco, A., Welch, V., Whiting, P. & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372(71), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pereira, V. e Hayasi, C. (2016). Comunidade de prática o ensino superior. Revista Ibero- Americana de Estudos em Educação, 11(1), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.2016.v11.n1.p204
Perrott, B. (2015). Including Consumers in the Organisational Knowledge Network. Knowledge and Process Management, 22(4), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1492
Ponsford, R., Ford, J., Korjonen, H., Hughes, E., Keswani, A., Pliakas, T. & Egan, M. (2017). Competing for space in an already crowded market: A mixed methods study of why an online community of practice (CoP) for alcohol harm reduction failed to generate interest amongst the group of public health professionals at which it was aimed. Implementation Science, 12, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0622-8
Randhawa, K., Josserand, E., Schweitzer, J. & Logue, D. (2017). Knowledge collaboration between organizations and online communities: the role of open innovation intermediaries. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1293–1318. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0423
Roberts, L. (2021). “This Is Just What We Do”: PhD Students on Becoming Scholars in a Community of Practice. Communications in Information Literacy, 15(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.4
Roulleaux, M. (2008). Organisation 2.0 - Le knowledge management nouvelle génération. Paris: Groupe Eyrolles.
Seyednazari, N., Avarsin, S. & Haj Atalou, J. (2018). Developing Communities of Practice Model to Enhance Knowledge and Improve learning among Faculty Members (Case Study: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences). Research and Development in Medical Education, 7(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.15171/rdme.2018.017
Shaw, L., Jazayeri, D., Kiegaldie, D., & Morris, M. (2021). Virtual communities of practice to improve clinical outcomes in healthcare: Protocol for a 10-year scoping review. BMJ Open, 11, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046998
Sigala, P., Ruiz-Guerrero, A. & Zurutuza, L. M. (2019). Improving the Praxis of Conversation Club Leaders in a Community of Practice: A Case Study in a Self- Access Centre. SiSAL Journal, 10(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.37237/100204
Spangler, S., Skovira, R. & Kohun, F. (2015). Key Factors in a Successful Knowledge Management Model. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 3(1), 51–60. Available from http://www.iiakm.org/ojakm/articles/2015/volume3_1/OJAKM_Volume3_1pp51-60.pdf
Staempfli, A., Tov, E., Kunz, R., Tschopp, D. & Stamm, E. (2016). Improving professionalism through reflection and discourse in communities of practice: The key situations in social work model and project. Journal of Practice Teaching & Learning, 14(2), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v14i2.940
Sztangret, I. (2016). Social media as a just-in-time-marketing—knowledge-diffusion tool on the example of it sector. Oeconomia, 15(4), 157–169. Available: https://aspe.sggw.edu.pl/article/view/354
Tan, C. N.-L. & Ramayah, T. (2018). Exploring the individual, social and organizational predictors of knowledge-sharing behaviours among communities of practice of SMEs in Malaysia. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 20(3), 375–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-09-2017-0071
Vieira, M. (2019). Comunidades de práticas como espaços de formação inicial na educação de jovens e adultos. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, 14(3), 1015–1029. https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v14i3.11139
Waris, M., Sanin, C. & Szczerbicki, E. (2019). Establishing intelligent enterprise through community of practice for product innovation. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 37(6), 7169–7178. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179329
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 1–5. Available from https://thesystemsthinker.com/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/090501pk.pdf
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Publishing Education.
Wieringa, S., Engebretsen, E., Heggen, K. & Greenhalgh, T. (2018). How knowledge is constructed and exchanged in virtual communities of physicians: Qualitative study of mindlines online. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8325

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sandra Valbuena Antolinez, Mario Vernaza Trujillo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.