A literature review of the effective model using ToS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.42.2.2021.Org.8Keywords:
Effective model, Entrepreneurship, Effectiveness, Causality, Tree of scienceAbstract
Entrepreneurship worldwide has been a source of inspiration for those who have made the decision to develop and run a business while assuming multiple risks. This has led to the implementation of the effective model, as a business experience logic that beginning entrepreneurs can use in the initial stage characterized by uncertainty. The main objective is to introduce readers to the main elements of this theory, in the current scientific dialogues and the debates that have been generated around the subject. This article is based on previous research carried out in the different social sciences to propose a chronological and theoretical vision of the subject, based on a retrospective in which previous studies that allow better decision-making by the entrepreneur are examined, based on an analysis of 297 research articles using the Tree of Science as a tool. The results showed that there is a science to entrepreneurship, a common logic that has been observed in savvy entrepreneurs called the effective model, that promises a method to follow to address problems, while growing businesses.
Downloads
References
Ahi, A., Baronchelli, G., Kuivalainen, O. & Piantoni, M. (2017). International Market Entry: How Do Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Make Decisions? . Journal of International Marketing, 25(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.15.0130
Alvárez, S. A. & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1-2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4
Arend, R. J., Sarooghi, H. & Burkemper, A. (2015). Effectuation As Ineffectual? Applying the 3E Theory-Assessment Framework to a Proposed New Theory of Entrepreneurship. AMOR, 40(4), 630–651. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0455
Aria, M. & Cuccurllo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Baker, T. & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
Brettel, M., Mauer, R., Engelen, A. & Küpper, D. (2012). Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001
Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A. & Mumford, T. V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006
Chandra, Y. (2017). A time-based process model of international entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(4), 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0068-x
Chandra, Y., Styles, C. & Wilkinson, I. F. (2015). Opportunity portfolio: Moving beyond single opportunity explanations in international entrepreneurship research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 199–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9400-1
Da Rocha, A., Simões, V. C., de Mello, R. C. & Carneiro, J. (2017). From global start-ups to the borderless firm: Why and how to build a worldwide value system. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 15(2), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-017-0200-9
Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D. & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002
Estrada, M. E., Verdú, A. J. & Gómez, J. M. (2018). Influence of the entrepreneur’s social identity on business performance through effectuation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.11.003
Futterer, F., Schmidt, J. & Heidenreich, S. (2018). Effectuation or causation as the key to corporate venture success? Investigating effects of entrepreneurial behaviors on business model innovation and venture performance. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.008
Gray, B. J., Duncan, S., Kirkwood, J. & Walton, S. (2014). Encouraging sustainable entrepreneurship in climate-threatened communities: a Samoan case study. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 26(5-6), 401–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.922622
Jones, O. & Li, H. (2017). Effectual entrepreneuring: sensemaking in a family-based start-up. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 29(5-6), 467–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1297854
Kalinic, I., Sarasvathy, S. D. & Forza, C. (2014). “Expect the unexpected”: Implications of effectual logic on the internationalization process. International Business Review, 23(3), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.11.004
Matalamäki, M. J. (2017). Effectuation, an emerging theory of entrepreneurship – towards a mature stage of the development. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(4), 928–949. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2017-0030
Matalamäki, M., Vuorinen, T., Varamäki, E. & Sorama, K. (2017). Business Growth in Established Companies; Roles of Effectuation and Causation. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 25(2), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495817500054
Mauer, R., Wuebker, R., Schlüter, J. & Brettel, M. (2018). Prediction and control: An agent-based simulation of search processes in the entrepreneurial problem space. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(2), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1271
Metzger, M. L. & King, J. S. (2015). Extending Constructivist Perspectives on Opportunity Production Through An Incorporation of Effectual Logics. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(4), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2014-0025
Packard, M. D., Clark, B. B. & Klein, P. G. (2017). Uncertainty Types and Transitions in the Entrepreneurial Process. Organization Science, 28(5), 840–856. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1143
Perry, J. T., Chandler, G. N. & Markova, G. (2012). Entrepreneurial Effectuation: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00435.x
Read, S., Song, M. & Smit, W. (2009). A meta-analytic review of effectuation and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(6), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.005
Reymen, I., Berends, H., Oudehand, R. & Stultiëns, R. (2017). Decision making for business model development: a process study of effectuation and causation in new technology-based ventures. R&D Management, 47(4), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12249
Robledo, S., Osorio, G. y López, C. (2014). Networking en pequeña empresa: una revisión bibliográfica utilizando la teoria de grafos. Revista vínculos, 11(2), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.14483/2322939X.9664
Rodríguez-Sepulveda, L. y Orrego-Alzate, C. (2016). Aplicaciones de mezclas de biopolímeros y polímeros sintéticos: Revisión bibliográfica. Revista científica, 25(2), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.14483//udistrital.jour.RC.2016.25.a9
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2009). . Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise.Charlottesville, VA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848440197
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/259121
Sarasvathy, S. D. & Dew, N. (2005a). New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15(5), 533–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-005-0264-x
Sarasvathy, S. & Dew, N. (2005b). Entrepreneurial logics for a technology of foolishness. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(4), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Scaman.2005.09.009
Sarasvathy, S., Kumar, K., York, J. G. & Bhagavatula, S. (2014). An Effectual Approach to International Entrepreneurship: Overlaps, Challenges, and Provocative Possibilities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12088
Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. AMOR, 25(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/259271
Stroe, S., Parida, V. & Wincent, J. (2018). Effectuation or causation: An fsQCA analysis of entrepreneurial passion, risk perception, and self-efficacy. Journal of Business Research, 89, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.035
Sunny, S.-J. & Chandra, Y. (2013). Growing artificial entrepreneurs: Advancing entrepreneurship research using agent-based simulation approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 19(2), 210–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551311310383
Toro-Arias, J. y Rodríguez, M. (2017). Formación en Ética en las Organizaciones: Revisión de la Literatura. Información Tecnológica, 28(2), 167–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642017000200018
Welter, C., & Kim, S. (2018). Effectuation under risk and uncertainty: A simulation model. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.11.005
Wiltbank, R., Dew, N., Read, S. & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2006). What to do next? The case for non-predictive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 981–998. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20142390
Yang, M. & Gabrielsson, P. (2017). Entrepreneurial marketing of international hightech business-to-business new ventures: A decision-making process perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 64,147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.01.007
Zuluaga, M., Robledo, S., Osorio-Zuluaga, G. A., Yathe, L., Gonzalez, D. & Taborda, G. (2016). Metabolomics and pesticides: systematic literature review using graph theory for analysis of references. NOVA, 14(25), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.1735

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 ECONÓMICAS CUC

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.